Angry Harry
Blog
 Page3
Guide To The Truth About Feminism

Recent comments from some emails - mostly from men - which can be viewed in full here. ...

"I cannot thank you enough."

"I stumbled upon your web site yesterday. I read as much as I could in 24 hours of your pages."

"I want to offer you my sincere thanks."

"I would just like to say that you are indeed a hero. "

"Your articles and site in general have changed my life."

"I have been reading your articles for hours ..."

"Firstly let me congratulate you on a truly wonderful site."

"I must say there aren't many sites that I regularly visit but yours certainly will be one of them, ..."

"It is terrific to happen upon your website."

"I just wanted to say thank you for making your brilliant website."

"I think I'm in love!" (from a woman)

"I love you. That is all. I love you!!!!" (from a man!)

"Your site is brilliant. It gives me hours of entertainment."

"You are worth your weight in gold."

"Love your site, I visit it on a regular basis for relief, inspiration and for the sake of my own sanity in a world gone mad."

"I ventured onto your site ... it's ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, and has kept me enthralled for hours!"

"I love the site, and agree with about 98% of what you post."

"I have been reading your site for a while now – and it is the best thing ever."

"you are doing a fabulous job in exposing the lies that silly sods like me have swallowed for years."

"Every single day I am sending thousands of youngsters to your site."

"I have to say it old man, but you are brilliant."

What a Piece of Sh*t is Man

The Trojan Horses Of Feminism

Fools And Feminists

Women - Weak and Pathetic?

Were Women Oppressed in the West?

The NSPCC Needs To Be Stopped

Rape Baloney

Harriet Harman Sucks

                               

Only Women Are Offered An Alternative To Domestic Violence

From 1976 to 2002 in the USA the number of women killed by their partners hardly changed at all, whereas the number of men killed by their partners dropped by 70%.

Indeed, in 1976 men and women killed each other at roughly equal rates.

So how is it that women still get killed as often by their partners as they used to do, whereas men now get killed far less often?

Well, the answer is really quite simple.

The draconian procedures adopted by the various domestic violence agencies throughout the past three decades have given aggressing women a way of avoiding having to commit an act of murder.

Instead of killing their partners (e.g. to eject them from their homes) aggressing women can now pick up their phones - and call in the police.

On the other hand, aggressing men do not have this option. They will get nowhere by picking up their phones. And so the number of women killed by these men has hardly changed at all.

It must be obvious even to the feminists and the various women's groups concerned with domestic violence that people are far more likely to be aggressive if they have nowhere to turn to for help, but to admit to the fact that their policies are saving the lives of men rather than the lives of women is something that they are most unlikely to do, given that this would expose their true agenda - which has nothing to do with decreasing domestic violence against women.

Indeed, if domestic violence against women was to decrease they would lose a major source of their funding. And if they were to admit that the women using their services were not the weak and wilting types but, rather, the aggressive violent types, they would also lose much of their public support. 

Indeed, this is the main reason that they hide as best as they can what goes on inside their refuge centres. (The last thing that they want the public to see is the kind of women who tend to use their services.)

Further evidence that it is aggressing women who are the women making the most use of domestic violence services (as opposed to those who are in genuine fear for their lives) comes from the work of Erin Pizzey - who was the founder of the refuge centres for battered women in the UK. 

Here is what she said.

"Most of the women arriving at our refuge centres were more violent, even toward their children, than were the men they were supposedly escaping from." (My underlining.)

Indeed, women are far more aggressive now than they were in the mid 1970s. As such, one would expect that they would be far more likely nowadays to aggress against men than they used to do. 

And so one would expect that the number of men killed by their female partners would have actually increased over the period from 1976 to 2002.

But this has just not happened. The number of men killed has actually decreased very dramatically.

And the reason for this is that aggressing women can now pick up their phones instead.

Quite simply, aggressing women do not need to act as violently as they used to do. They can get the authorities to do their 'violence' for them.

On the other hand, women who are being aggressed against are killed just as often as before - which is why the death rates for women has hardly changed.

If the feminists and the women's groups were really concerned about domestic violence against women, they would be demanding that aggressing men were given the option of getting help by picking up their phones.

And the fact that they vigorously oppose providing any help to men who are feeling aggressive says a great deal about what their true agenda really is - and decreasing domestic violence against women clearly has very little to do with it.

Finally, it is worth pointing out that the 1976 figures demonstrate quite clearly that men and women will kill each other at roughly equal rates if they are treated equally by the authorities. And this is further evidence for the well-supported view that women are just as prone to relationship violence as men. 

All that has happened since 1976 is that aggressing women have been provided with an alternative to violence, whereas aggressing men have not.
Also see Would You Sign This Contract?
 

When women were 'oppressed' ...








click a picture

Western men die some five years earlier than women. They suffer more from nearly every medical disease and ailment that there is. And yet, far more money is spent by governments on women's health than on men's health. Men are also nowadays educationally disadvantaged significantly compared to women; with the curriculum, the teaching methods and the resources being designed to cater far more for women and girls than for men and boys. Men make up 80% of the homeless. There are more of them in social service care-homes as boys. They are many times more likely to be wrongfully arrested, wrongfully imprisoned, mugged, assaulted or murdered. They are 5 times more likely to lose their children when families break down, 4 times more likely to lose their homes, 4 times more likely to commit suicide, 20 times more likely to be killed or injured at work, 20 times more likely to be imprisoned, and, probably, more than 100 times more likely to be demeaned, denigrated and ridiculed by the mainstream media. Men also pay much more in taxes than women but receive far less in benefits from the government.

In other words, when compared to women, men are significantly disadvantaged when it comes to their health, their lifespans, their homes, their children, their education, their families, the tax burden, the law, the benefit system, and even when it comes to their own personal safety. 

They are nowadays also being heavily discriminated against in the work place.

How is it possible, therefore, that women are being 'oppressed' more than men?

In what areas?

Where?

-----------

Are you an intelligent person who believes that feminism is about 'equality'? If so, then please just take five minutes of your time to read the piece Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable and you will see that feminism is nothing of the sort. Far from it. It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies imaginable. Apply your intelligence for just five minutes, and you will surely see the truth about feminism for yourself.