Women Manipulate Men

Men's brains are designed to spend their time figuring out how to get objects in the environment to do their bidding.

Women's brains are designed to spend their time figuring out how to get **men** to do their bidding.

Men manipulate the environment. Women manipulate men.

Men manipulate the environment. Women manipulate men.

This is why, for example, men devote so much of their time to fiddling around with gadgets, solving problems and playing games, whereas women spend much of their time and money altering the way that they look and 'chatting about relationships'.

This is, of course, a sweeping generalisation. But from my own observations, it is a pretty good one!

Indeed, within 48 hours of being born, female babies are more likely to spend their time gawping at human faces while male babies tend to be attracted by just about everything else.

Even baby chimps prefer toys more appropriate for their gender.

And you cannot blame the 'patriarchy' for that!

Most men would be staggered if they understood the lengths to which women normally go in order to manipulate them. But they seem to be completely blind to it.

And the reason is that, for the most part, men are just not operating in the same realm.

And this, for example, explains why women are apt to get so uptight and make false accusations against men (e.g. 'date rape') when the relationship does not go according to their plan the following day.

They see such an event as a 'failure to manipulate the man successfully' and this goes right to the very core of their egos. Whereas the men involved in such situations were not usually thinking about 'meaningful' relationships at all.

(It is a bit like saying that somebody is hopeless when it comes to dealing with children. Saying this to a man is  not likely to be quite as devastating to the ego as is saying this to a woman.)

 feminism and political correctness have hidden from view the truly manipulative natures of women.

And one of the reasons that we are facing so many problems here in the west is that feminism and political correctness have hidden from view the truly manipulative natures of women.

Indeed, if you look closely at the details surrounding much of the inter-gender disharmony that takes place these days (e.g. domestic violence) you will usually see therein a woman who failed to get what she wanted out of the man involved - rather than the other way round.

For example, he whacks her not so much because he wants to control her, or because he wants to achieve something, but because she persists in going on and on and on and on about something that she wants. And in doing so, she is well-trained in the art of using the verbal knife in order to hurt him and to drive him crazy.

Indeed, if you study the court cases, it transpires that many men have killed their partners because they could no longer stand the sound of "her voice going on and on and on".

50 years ago, if a man slapped his wife, BOTH MEN AND WOMEN were usually of the view that she deserved it in some way. And the reason that they usually thought this was because they knew how easy it was for women to manipulate men and they also knew how hard it was to provoke normal men into assaulting women.

In fact, most societies - and religions - seem to have been aware of this for thousands of years. (Remember the ducking stool!)

In the west, however, the astonishing ability that women have to manipulate men has been hidden from view.

In the west, however, the astonishing ability that women have to manipulate men has been hidden from view. And so when there is some kind of inter-gender conflict taking place, the only focus is on the behavioural actions of the men involved. The women are purposely portrayed as passive dummies who are completely innocent. And yet nothing could be further from the truth.

When a man is watching a football match, he sees strategies, angles, tactics, formations, combinations etc to do with the game. A woman sees a group of men wasting their time, pointlessly kicking a spherical object around a field.

When a woman is watching a soap opera, however, she sees strategies, angles, tactics, formations, combinations etc to do with the manipulation of relationships. A man simply sees a story unfolding.

It is fundamental gender differences such as this that feminists and their politically-corrected drones have managed to hide to the detriment of us all.

...

Wives Make The Decisions

The attitudes of wives is a key factor in whether or not their husbands smoke marijuana, a US study has found.

Research by the University of Buffalo found men were more likely start or resume smoking cannabis in the first year of marriage if their wives smoked. They were more likely to quit in this time if their wives did not share their fondness for it.

Men did not influence their wives' marijuana use but were more likely to determine the couple's drinking habits - at least for the first year. But by the second year, women were back in control.

Kenneth Leonard and Gregory Homish, from the university's addiction research unit, looked at 634 couples and gathered information before marriage, at their first anniversary and a year later.

"Wives influenced their husbands' initiation of marijuana use, but husbands did not influence wives' use," Dr Leonard said.

...

 if you want to make an audience laugh, then you must make the women laugh

One of the most interesting observations often made by stand-up comedians is that, apparently, if you want to make an audience laugh, then you must make the women laugh. If you have successfully amused the women, then the men will be amused too.

The converse, however, does not apply, and so canny comedians know that to win over an audience then you must win over the women.

The above article concerning drug abuse also demonstrates just how influential are women over the attitudes and behaviours of men and, hence, over society. And, as such, it helps to expose the ubiquitous feminist lie that women have been mostly mistreated in the past by men and that they have been 'powerless'.

Indeed, as my regular readers will know, whenever I have looked closely at different times and cultures, it always seems to me that men have been far more badly treated than women regardless of when and where they might have existed.

So much so does this appear to be true that I cannot help feeling that there must be some kind of relatively simple biological/evolutionary 'law' - that is applicable to human psychology - that prevents any other possibility - given the circumstances in which human evolution has taken place.

And if you also accept that, by and large, women are very adept at manipulating men, then you can perhaps imagine just how huge - throughout History - will have been the forces stacked against any form of 'oppression' against women.

And I would also hazard a guess that - throughout History - women will have judged 'how badly they were being treated' by comparing their treatment with those of the men who lived around them.

And if they had ever determined that they were being treated rather shabbily in comparison to the men who lived around them, then they would have used their huge psychological power - both collectively and as individuals - to ensure that such a situation would not prevail for very long.

 I doubt very much that women have ever been treated worse than men throughout most places and times.

In other words, I doubt very much that women have ever been treated worse than men throughout most places and times. Indeed, the evidence seems to show quite conclusively that it is men who have been mistreated the most.

Finally, if women are the primary arbiters of what people may be permitted to laugh about, then they surely perform the very same function when it comes to what people may be permitted to cry about. 

After all, the emotions relating to laughing and crying are inextricably bound up with each other.

And if women are, indeed, the determiners of what society cries about, then this means that they also determine what people should be concerned about - which means, of course, that they exert a great deal of control over what actually takes place in a society.

And what we have seen over the past century in the west is women not only exerting their huge psychological power in order to bend society to their will, but also colluding with both government and business to exert an even greater force.

Both collectively and individually, women are not the hapless victims that they so often portray themselves to be

Both collectively and individually, women are not the hapless victims that they so often portray themselves to be. And, in my view, it is men who are - and have been - mostly in need of liberating from 'oppression'; not women.

Why is it so easy for women to manipulate men?

Why do women like the Bad Guys rather than the Nice Guys?

The answers to these intriguing questions are revealed in the article entitled ...

Women and Chimps
(And Men)