The Trojan Horses of Feminism

We all know that there are many bad people in this world who set out to harm others in some way or another; perhaps to rob them, or to cheat them, or even to kill them. And these people often present themselves in a positive light in order to fool those whom they are intent on harming.

And so, for example, Jews were often led peacefully and without protest toward the gas chambers because the Nazis had tricked them into believing that they were merely going to be given the opportunity to have a nice cleansing shower.

And confidence tricksters of all kinds will present themselves to their future victims as very pleasant personalities in order to generate warmth and trust - which they will eventually betray.

Often these malicious people work in teams, but sometimes they can use the cover of the good natures of unsuspecting others in order to entrap people into falling for their nasty scams.

For example, an unscrupulous  businesswoman might use the name of a trusted individual - perhaps a celebrity - in order to advertise and sell a product that is not up to standard.

Well. This is the type of method that the feminists have successfully used over and over again throughout the past many decades in order to hoodwink the public into believing that their ideology and their motives are pure, wholesome and worthy of support.

They hide behind the cover of the pleasant personalities of others in order to get endorsement for their self-serving pursuits and agendas.

In many cases, these pleasant personalities are just ordinary women who have been bamboozled into believing that feminism is just about 'equality' and fair play. These gullible women then often masquerade as feminists themselves, thus giving credence and a positive image to the malicious feminists behind the scenes and to their bankrupt ideology.

I have already written many articles demonstrating that feminism is an ideology that is both based and energised almost exclusively on the generation of hatred towards men, and I do not propose to go through all the evidence for this here.

But this evidence shows quite clearly that ...

Feminism is not about equality. It is a revolting ideology that is akin to Nazism

Feminism is not about equality. It is a revolting ideology that is akin to Nazism; e.g. see Feminism and Nazism

It is led by some very nasty women; e.g. see Feminists Are Nasty Things.

It is not about equality; e.g. see Equality Between Men and Women Is Not Achievable

Its proponents perpetrate lie after lie after lie; e.g. see The Truth About The Rape Statistics

And their persistent claim that women get paid less for the same work as men is rubbish; e.g. see Some BBC Propaganda Tricks.

Feminism is also creating and inflaming a never-ending gender war; e.g. see A Permanent Gender War?

Feminists have been caught lying, cheating and deceiving over and over again in order to further their aims. They have corrupted the justice system, robbed men of their homes and their children, cheated men in the workplace, deprived boys of a decent education, stolen most of the health budget and, via the media, have engaged in an onslaught of male hatred for three decades that is almost impossible to imagine so massive has it been.

one of their more disgusting aims - which they try to hide - is to destroy people's families

And one of their more disgusting aims - which they try to hide - is to destroy people's families and their close relationships.

As just one tiny example of this hidden agenda, here follows an excerpt from an article by Sandra Paterson in this week's New Zealand Herald (NOTE: Link defunct).

There is a little old lady in Auckland with whom Helen Clark would not be very pleased. If she knew who she was, that is.

Back in the 1970s, when the little old lady was much younger, she used to go to feminist meetings. Not because she was a feminist, but because she and her husband were concerned at the sorts of things being discussed.

"So I would go off to all these meetings around the country to monitor what was going on," she says. "I remember there was an outcry at one conference because a woman had brought along her baby son. He wasn't wanted in the room because he was a male."

She also remembers many of the women who attended or addressed these events, among them Helen Clark, Sylvia Cartwright, Marilyn Waring, Cath Tizard, Ros Noonan and Margaret Wilson.

For decades she has watched as the young feminists of the 70s became some of the most powerful leaders in New Zealand. And for decades she held on to a couple of documents which outlined, all those years ago, a long-term feminist agenda to change New Zealand society by attacking the traditional family unit.

Lately, however, concerned at just how much of the agenda was being accomplished, she passed the papers to a friend, who in turn sent them to me and to journalist Ian Wishart, as covered in this month's Investigate magazine, which you can be sure is not on the coffee table at the PM's house.

The documents in question were written by another regular at the 1970s women's meetings, Kay Goodger, who is now a senior adviser in the Ministry of Social Development.

Goodger called on the radical feminists of the day - Clark and co - to do everything they could in their spheres of influence to replace or sideline the traditional family.

"The family distorts all human relationships by imposing on them the framework of economic compulsion, social dependence and sexual repression," she wrote. "Our goal must be to create economic and social institutions that are superior to the present family."

... Coercive family laws should be abolished, she wrote, adding that "the rearing, social welfare and education of children should become the responsibility of society rather than individual parents."

It is there, in front of your nose.

These feminists could not give a damn about the damage that they have caused to millions of families - something that they purposely set out to do. They do not give two hoots for the communities that they have destroyed, nor for the millions of people whose lives have been damaged. And they care not a jot for the trillions of dollars that have been wasted and expended across the western world over the decades in vain attempts to counter the serious problems that they have purposely been creating; such as those caused by fatherlessness.

Destroying people's families and their relationships is one of their main aims. And if you look at the activities that they have engaged in over the past few decades, nearly every move of theirs is consistent with this aim. And you need to wake up to this.

 feminism is little more than an ideology of hatred

Indeed, the evidence is that feminism is little more than an ideology of hatred.

Hatred towards men.

And feminists will do everything that they can to keep stirring up this hatred.

As just one example of this, many of you will have continually been indoctrinated with the view that western women were oppressed in the past because they were 'denied the vote'. This is utter nonsense. There was virtually nothing to vote for a century ago, because national governments were tiny. (The tax rate was about  6% and not many people paid it.)

People hardly knew that their national governments existed, so little did they impinge upon daily life. And if you look closely at the small amount of social legislation that western governments did pass in those days, it was invariably in favour of women, and often to the detriment of men.

For example, during the middle of the 1800's, western governments passed legislation restricting the working hours of women and children. There were no such restrictions on the working hours of men - who often had to labour for 16 hours a day, Indeed, many of the early feminists in this period were not complaining that the lack of voting rights somehow amounted to an 'oppression' of women, but that women were too often wasting their time on trivial matters once their children were grown up, and that giving them the vote might actually cause them to take more of an interest in the working of society.

Another example of feminist deceits ... is the bogus claim that women were denied jobs

Another example of feminist deceits - one that is often used to demonise men and to stir up hatred toward them - is the bogus claim that women were denied jobs and/or were paid less than men in the past in order to keep them oppressed in some way. 

This is a blatant lie.

The truth of the matter is that both men and women recognised that no communities could survive for very long if some families had two wage earners while others had none. They would have been torn apart by the relentless discord and violence that such a situation would have created. And it was women, themselves, who wanted to ensure that their men were gainfully employed; e.g. see Women - Weak and Pathetic?

And if any woman had dared to take one of "their men's jobs" it is the women who would have torn her to pieces; not the men. 

And they would have been protecting their families and their communities by doing so.

Furthermore, the notion that women wanted hordes of unemployed men and youths languishing in their communities with nothing to do except cause trouble is patently ridiculous.

But, yes, it is true that when more women started to do jobs that were previously the preserve of men, they were often paid less.

But there were two main reasons for this.

1. They did not incur the same level of wrath from other men and women.

2. They usually had a husband to support them, whereas men usually had to support their wives and their children. And if women had been paid the same as men, then the same type of problems would have arisen as before. "My husband (or son) hasn't got a job because that woman down the road has taken it; etc etc etc."

And when women went out to work in those days it was mostly just to earn a little money to pay for the little 'extras' in life - in fact, much the same as many women still do today.

But the point is this.

It was women - just as much as men - who engineered the kind of society in which they lived

It was women - just as much as men - who engineered the kind of society in which they lived. And I can almost guarantee you that wherever you find any instances wherein women - as a gender - were, in fact, being treated shabbily - even for those times -  there will be many more instances wherein men were being treated worse.

But feminism is a truly disgusting ideology that thrives on fuelling male-hatred and it survives only by perpetuating lies.

And when women today identify themselves as feminists they are supporting both this hateful ideology as well as the hate-mongering self-serving deceitful women who lead it, and they are encouraging others to see feminism as some kind of benign influence when it is nothing of the sort.

It is one of the most malicious and destructive ideologies that one could dream up; e.g. see The Benefits of Feminism.

And so when I see nice, pleasant women supporting feminism in any way at all, my blood begins to boil. They make me think of the smiling benevolent faces that so often welcomed the Jews to the camps and showed them the way to the shower rooms. And the nicer and the more pleasant are these ignorant women, the more benign and alluring do they portray feminism to be.

As such, they are a significant malevolent force working on behalf of the whole foul feminist enterprise.

Women who call themselves feminists, or who support feminists or feminism - no matter how nice and pleasant they might be - are Trojan Horses through which feminism maintains its torrential volley of hatred.

...

"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman) 

"The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft." ("The Declaration of Feminism," November 1971). 

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." (Radical feminist leader Sheila Cronan) 

"We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men..." Elizabeth Cady Stanton, "One Woman, One Vote", Wheeler, p.58 

"The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist." ( Sheila Cronan, National NOW Times, Jan.1988) 

" "We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." - from Sisterhood Is Powerful, Robin Morgan (ed), 1970, p.537. 

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage" (Sheila Cronan, 1988 Houston National Organization for Women {NOW} Conference for Women.). 

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." .... "You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs." (Catherine MacKinnon - Prominent feminist scholar at the University of Michigan and Yale) 

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." (Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan) 

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig" .... "The traditional flowers of courtship are the traditional flowers of the grave, delivered to the victim before the kill. The cadaver is dressed up and made up and laid down and ritually violated and consecrated to an eternity of being used." .... "Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." (Andrea Dworkin). 

"A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced.'  Judith Levine 

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things." Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men.) 

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies. 

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..." Sheila Jeffrys. 

MALE:...represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants...the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.  MAN:...an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched...a contradictory baby-man...  From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985: 

"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex." Valerie Solana, SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men.)