|
|
||
|
Angry Harry's Male Student's Guide To Feminism HarrysNews ... Front
Page Chapin's
Inferno
Blog #2 To
search this site for a specific article, click on any topic in the above menu
and press GO! This will also take you to a Google webpage that
will allow you to search this site specifically, using your own
key words. Taxes
...
The
truth behind the domestic violence figures ...
Dishonest Media ... The
Law Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. George Orwell Western governments summarised ... too big, too intrusive, too corrupt and too expensive. Western politicians summarised ... too greedy, too self serving, too dishonest and too expensive. We
are all doomed! ... The
latest BBC news. News
When women were oppressed ...
The Abuse of Power
|
Google Finally Admits Deceiving Public Google this week admitted that its staff will pick and choose what appears in its search results. It's a historic statement - and nobody has yet grasped its significance. Yep: It's Slit Your Own Wrists Week on Angry Harry ...
Conclusion: We have got to get rid of the left, and we must cut public spending - by cutting down on the size of government; not by cutting down on services to the old, the sick and the needy. Also, Brits please take note that Gordon Brown was not - as is commonly believed to be the case - a good Chancellor of the Exchequer. For example, he stole huge amounts of money from pensioners when he first came to power in order to prop up government spending - and he is doing it again. And, of course, if financiers like Peter Schiff could see the writing on the wall, way back in 2006, then why on Earth did Gordon Brown not 'see' it? Gordon Brown is, has been, and will continue to be, a disaster for the UK. Furthermore, his main aim is to enlarge and empower left-wing governments - the world over. And that shyster will not hesitate to cause problems to his very own people in order to be able to claim that more 'government' is needed - which is exactly what he is doing right now. Indeed, it is for this reason that Gordon Brown is currently being hailed by many governments in other countries as, "The man who came up with the best solution to the current economic crisis." But this 'solution' is only being seen by them as the 'best' solution because it takes away huge amounts of money out of the pockets of ordinary people and sticks it into the coffers of governments. So, who can be surprised to find that governments all over the world are positively delighted to employ Gordon Brown's 'solution'? Tory MP Arrested Extraordinary details of the heavy-handed police operation against Shadow Immigration Mini Nine counter-terrorism officers raided the MP's London home, frightening his 15-year-old daughter Verity and wife Alicia who were there. I am almost speechless. This outrageous attack on our democracy by a bunch of over-zealous, over-empowered and, quite clearly, over-resourced counter-terrorism police officers must surely give us all some true indication of just how tyrannical and self-serving has the UK government now become. Furthermore, have our counter-terrorism police officers got nothing better to do? Don't they have terrorists to catch and to deter? Obviously not! Last week a junior Home Office official, aged 26, was arrested. He was arrested for whistle-blowing and for exposing various cover-ups by the Home Office in matters to do with immigration. And yet I remember quite clearly that when Labour came to power in 1997 Labour ministers said that whistleblowers would be protected not prosecuted if their revelations were in the public interest - which, quite clearly, immigration matters are. No Real Evidence Needed The father of a young British tennis player accused of rape has insisted his son’s alleged victim was ‘chasing him around all night’. Bonanza For Jobs - but only in the public sector. Independent specialists published forecasts showing that an extra 50,000 public officials will have been recruited in the six months to the end of the year. This is obscene given the long-term problems that those who do not work for government are having to endure. (Also see AH's The Governmental Beast.) European Union Costs A Fortune The European Union is costing Britain a staggering £106,000 a minute, a think-tank has revealed. As the UK teeters on the brink of what experts predict will be the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression, the Government has surrendered £55.8billion to Brussels this year.
Drew Peterson is a former Bolingbrook, Illinois police sergeant who has received nationwide attention in the United States for becoming a suspect in a police investigation following the death of his third wife and subsequent disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy. Peterson has repeatedly denied involvement in both cases. Drew Peterson is probably going to be charged with homicide in the near future - judging by the enormous amount of circumstantial evidence against him that seems to be accumulating. There's mountains of it! And the other day I was recalling the recent trial in the UK of a group of Muslims who intended to cause bomb explosions in various cities. The trial went on for weeks! There was evidence from CCTV cameras, telephone conversations, clandestine meetings, secret trips, photographs of bomb equipment, hidden documents, and goodness knows what else. There was testimony from police officers, MI5, forensics experts, bomb-making aficionados, relatives, neighbours, friends, witnesses to various events, and officials from an assortment of international agencies, and goodness knows who else. So, please tell me, Someone. How is it that men are convicted of rape on the sole basis of the uncorroborated testimony of one aggrieved woman? Tories Aim To Support Relationships Under the proposals Britain's family laws will be reformed to prevent children whose parents do split up from losing contact with their fathers and grandparents. The interim report recommends a series of measures to make marriage more attractive and divorce more difficult. It calls for pre-nuptial agreements - which set out financial and property rights before marrying - to be made legally binding to encourage more people to marry. City Firm Pays Millions to Muslim Twins Two Muslim sisters have won a multi-million pound settlement on the verge of an explosive tribunal which threatened to make public claims of widespread drug abuse and racial bigotry in the City. The Daily Mail has learned that it included allegations that executives removed the women’s Jewish clients and transferred them to non-Muslim colleagues. The racial claims seem to suggest that the company was arranging matters so that their clients were allocated to staff who were not likely to cause them concern; e.g. Jewish clients were being allocated to non-Muslim staff. But, hold on here! Don't we all nowadays have to accommodate to the various sensibilities of different groups? Does the government itself not demand that we now all take into account their feelings? So, how is it that when a company does this, it is seen as 'racist'? Surely, the company was just trying to cater for Jewish sensibilities. And do we not also have Muslims in this country who even insist on using their own sharia courts in certain areas - using Muslim judges and Muslim staff? Why is this not seen as being racist? In other words, how is it that Jewish clients are not allowed to elect non-Muslim staff to deal with their financial accounts while Muslims, themselves, can quite freely elect to have non-Jewish judges deal with their court cases? It seems to me that if Muslims can specifically choose Muslims to deal with their legal matters, then Jews should be able to choose Jews (or anyone else) to deal with their financial matters. No Murders At Jersey Home No children were murdered at the Haut de la Garenne former care home. Yes indeed, but the paedophile hysteria - and, hence, the male hatred - that the media and the police generated over the discovered human 'bones' lasted for months. Indeed, the police even lied to the public concerning what they were discovering, as was pointed out by Brendan O'Neill at the time ... Quite simply, it seems that the chief investigating officer lied. Never, ever believe those who are working in the 'abuse' industry. They work behind closed doors. The law allows them to operate in secrecy. And they are forever trying to get more support and more funding. Webster thinks the police kept the bone story alive because they instinctively knew that the bone helped to keep the inquiry in the public eye and in receipt of public funds. But, of course, the financial cost of this dishonesty has been relatively trivial in comparison to the enormous social and personal costs that all men (and, hence, the whole of society) will have to pay as a result of it. The media hysteria that was generated over these 'bones' lasted for months. And the way in which the officials behaved in this matter is a typical example of how those who work in the abuse industry lie and exaggerate quite unashamedly simply in order to feather their own nests. Yes indeed. Those shysters in the Labour Government have finally cottoned on to the huge damage that they will cause themselves by not reducing taxes. Clearly, they have been reading my most masterful pontifications on the matter - and they are terrified! I have been railing at my missus over these past few weeks for the government's failure to introduce tax cuts in these most economically-depressed times. And the word 'scumbags' kept coming out of my mouth. So, on the one hand, and financially speaking, I am happy that some tax cuts now seem to be on the way. On the other hand, however, I was going to gain a lot of activist mileage if the government failed to reduce taxes. I could have moaned about it for months! But all is not lost; because until the government reduces its spending, those people who do not work for government are still going to have to bear all the costs of the current crisis - which, for many thousands of people, includes the loss of their businesses and their jobs. And any immediate tax cuts will simply defer the payment of those costs to a later time. In other words, unless government reduces its spending, these tax cuts will not really be cuts at all. All they mean is that, "You can pay me next week, instead of today." That's not a cut; that's a deferment! Scumbags! Why Governments Love Feminism First and foremost, feminism is about various groups seeking to acquire power and money, and to build huge self-serving empires in which millions - literally millions - of people nowadays have a vested interest ... AH - 10 min - sorry Guys - a bit long! - so, before reading, get yourself a few cans of beer, roll yourself the most enormous joint, and then tell that no-good hussy of yours to get herself ready for a bit of heavy-duty action - in about 10 minutes. Better still, tell her to get all her good-looking girlfriends to come round, or she will rue the day that she met you. Yep. Discipline is what we need round here. ... ... ... Good old-fashioned discipline!
I was going to refrain from making any comments about Obama's victory in the American elections, but, in the end, I just could not resist the temptation. Basically, I had a choice. Either I pontificate unrestrainedly about Obama's victory to let all the agony pour out of my nervous system, or I murder the missus. It was a close call! And so I wrote this huge piece about the likely future course of racism now that Obama is going to be the president, but, in the end, I decided that I probably had no idea what I was talking about. In other words, I felt just like the politically-corrected left and the feminists must forever feel. And so I decided to cut, chop and delete portions from my piece until I was left with something that might actually be of interest to my readers. And the following is all that remained ... There is always a danger that Obama's victory will eventually lead to more anti-black racism, and it is partly for this reason that I strongly suspect that Obama's presidency will not turn out to be good for 'men'. Here is my reasoning. Firstly, it is not going to be easy for Obama to continue to privilege black people (e.g. through affirmative action procedures) without risking the accusation that he is simply serving his own kind. "Hey, you're just privileging your own kind of people. That's not fair. That's racist!" In other words, it is actually easier for a white president to hand out special privileges to black people than it is for a black president. And so my guess is that ordinary black people are not going to benefit very much by having a black president. To compensate for this, and to keep his left-wing credentials intact, Obama will therefore probably heap far more favours in the direction of the feminists. Indeed, I can already envisage him creating a law whereby women are paid $20 an hour just for breathing! And so my guess is that black men are going to be particularly disappointed by his presidency because they will be facing a double whammy. The second reason that Obama's victory is likely to be bad for 'men' is because he is a left-wing statist. As such, he believes that 'people' should be disempowered and that those who work for government should call most of the shots. But, perhaps, there is also some good news for 'men' to be found here. The black racial activists will have had much of the wind taken out of their sails by Obama's victory for the following reasons. They will have less to moan about - after all, a black person clearly can make it to the very top in America. The president is black - which means that they cannot play the race card so easily. Obama's victory somewhat kyboshes the illusion that white America is strongly racist - which makes it less easy for black activists to claim that it is. The upshot will be that black men will likely spend more time considering their gender and less time considering their colour when it comes to understanding why they might be getting second-class treatment. And the MM can only benefit from this. Indeed, racial arguments have divided 'men' throughout the whole of history; and they have certainly made it much more difficult for the MM to grow. Obama's victory might, therefore, help the MM to attract a greater following. All in all, therefore, I suspect that Obama's victory is not going to turn out to be good for 'men', but that it will turn out to be good for the MM. It must also be said that Obama's victory is very good for America's standing in the world. Apart from the fact that Obama is black - which, like it or not, means a great deal to many people - he also seems to be a very decent, likeable, intelligent man who is likely to command a great deal of respect hither and thither. And so I think that America - as a whole - will be much stronger vis-a-vis the rest of the world as a result of Obama's victory. Indeed, in the international arena, Obama seems likely to outshine every other national leader on the planet for some considerable time to come. Interestingly, if it had not been for the internet and for the likes of Google, I suspect that McCain would have won; because, quite simply, we would now all believe that Saddam Hussein really did have WMDs that were deliverable to the west in 45 minutes, that Jessica Lynch really was a national heroine who had fought her way out of some Iraqi stronghold, that the prison at Guantanamo really was a holiday camp, and that Iraqi prisoner abuse was really some kind of left-inspired fiction. Bush would therefore have now been seen as a hero and a saver of the world! Make no mistake; without the internet, the mainstream media would never have given us the truth about Iraq - particularly with powerful media men like Rupert Murdoch always desperate to ingratiate themselves to any current powers-that-happen-to-be. Indeed, even with the internet, it took some two years before the American mainstream media caught up with the European media when it came to exposing what was really going on in Iraq. ... And that, my Dear Reader, is all that was left of my most fabulous piece! Pensions Public Vs Private The average private sector worker retires with a pension pot worth £25,100 - enough to pay them about £1,700 a year. The average public sector worker will retire with a pot of £427,275 - worth £17,091 a year. Private sector workers pay £14billion a year into their own retirement funds, but contribute around £21billion through their taxes for the pensions of retired public sector workers. (That £14billion has to cater for about three times as many people as does the £21billion cater for.) On War Wear a poppy ... for the lions killed in war, not the donkeys who send them there. Jeremy Paxman I cannot tell you how pleased I am to see Jeremy Paxman (famous UK BBC TV presenter) wade into the public consciousness by espousing views that are not too dissimilar to those expressed round here. Especially with bits like this ... The men and women who send our soldiers to war - and that devout Christian Tony Blair sent British forces into action six times in five years - have never had to carry a gun themselves. ... The way things are going in Afghanistan, British soldiers could still be risking life and limb long after Tony Blair has retired to his country house and a seat in the House of Lords. Always remember that those lofty politicians and high-ranking civil servants can easily escape from all the ills that they, themselves, promote throughout their societies. Blair Makes Millions Tony Blair’s earnings since leaving Downing Street are calculated to have topped £12 million, more than six times his previous lifetime income. The former Prime Minister, who tours the world speaking to audiences including investment banks, private equity firms and chambers of commerce, is now said to be the highest-paid speaker in the world. Goodness. All those financiers giving Tony Blair soooo much money. You know, the ones currently being bailed out. By you; the taxpayer. Coincidence? Aw Harry; you are such a fool. You don't think that Tony Blair knew that the current economic crises was going to come about, do you? No. But I do know that politicians have been 'on message' for some time. "Support the big financiers and, one day, they will reward you - most handsomely." Oh look. There's more! He has made £4.6 million from his memoirs, an estimated £2 million from JPMorgan Chase — including bonus — and £500,000 from Zurich Financial Services. Does anyone really think that Tony Blair is a financial whizz-kid of some sort? - and that this is why these high-faluting financiers are so eager to hear his pearls of wisdom. Blair knows about as much about finance as I do. Less, probably! Wake up. This is just a money-laundering scam! The lofty financiers were not going to give Blair any money while he was in office, because this would have been illegal. So, instead, they wait until he leaves office and then they give him huge fees to talk about something or other. And Blair knew that this would happen. Unlike most of you lot out there, politicians know how the game is played. (Hence, for example, the recent clandestine shenanigans of left-wing MP Peter Mandelson and right-wing MP George Osborne dancing naked together, hand in hand, while on the yacht of some Russian billionaire oligarch who runs the most enormous aluminium company. Well, something like that.) The Times can disclose that Tony Blair has become a particular favourite with the Washington-based Carlyle Group. Ah yes. The Carlyle Group. Who would have guessed it? Not you! That's for sure! Carlyle Group is a leading private equity investor in the military. Its board has been graced by both Presidents Bush and its former European chairman was Sir John Major. Now. Let's read that first bit again - together - shall we? Carlyle Group is a leading private equity investor in the military. Louder please. Carlyle Group is a leading private equity investor in the military! That's better. Another coincidence? Have a good think about it. And now, take a look at this ... Carlyle and the Blair Government have a controversial history. The National Audit Office said taxpayers lost millions from the privatisation of spy technology because of Labour’s decision to appoint Carlyle Group as a preferred bidder too quickly. Yep. Carlyle got the mazulah. And now it's payback time. Hence the lectures and the money-laundering. Ho Hum. Help Needed For Whites Britain risks a surge in Right-wing extremism if it fails to help its white working class weather the recession, the equalities chief will warn today. Trevor Phillips will break with years of political convention to call for the law to be changed to enshrine positive discrimination in favour of disadvantaged whites. It is good to see Trevor Phillips arguing the case for helping whites - particularly since he has spent the past twenty years battering them. Will Racism Derail Obama? Charles Henry, a California professor who was among the first to research the Bradley effect, says Mr Obama would need a double-digit lead to feel confident of victory. Any seasoned political junkie watching the BBC coverage of the run-up to the American presidential elections must surely be feeling somewhat embarrassed at the way in which John McCain has been portrayed. Over and over again the BBC has sneakily drawn attention to any mishaps or misjudgments occurring in the McCain camp while carefully selecting only the best moments from the Obama camp. This was particularly noticeable in the BBC's programmes of the highlights of the various presidential debates. But it was sneaky! It was very subtle, but it was cleverly done - and it was relentless. Even more galling has been the continuing attempt to portray white Americans as being heavily racist. Over and over again, the BBC has tried to suggest that Obama was suffering from anti-black sentiment - anti-black sentiment that was 'hidden'. In other words, the BBC is playing the same old game much loved by the abuse industry and the feminists. Abuse! Discrimination! You can't see it. We can't find evidence for it. But it's there! Well, I do not know enough about Americans to pontificate very much about the likely effects of race when it comes to the presidential elections, but I do know enough about the old game of accusing people of 'racism' simply in order to benefit in some way. And I also know what I, myself, can see! And most of the racism that I have seen coming from America - and, indeed, from the BBC - is anti-white racism, not anti-black racism. Indeed, the evidence that I have seen suggests very strongly that more people will be voting for Obama 'because he is black' than will not be voting for him 'because he is black'. That's racism! And, furthermore, the evidence that I have seen suggests very strongly that more people will be voting for Obama 'because he is black' than will be voting for John McCain 'because he is white'. That's racism! But, of course, the BBC never mentions this aspect of 'racism'. In addition, it is also being continually suggested that when Americans are polled with regard to their voting intentions, many will simply pretend to be voting for Obama because they want to hide their racism; i.e. they are racists. But, surely, much more likely these days is that people might pretend to be voting for Obama because, otherwise, they will be accused of being racist - much as people are whenever, for example, they express concern about something like immigration. Indeed, why would anyone lie to a humble pollster unless they were fearful of being accused of something? And so if people are, indeed, lying about their intention to vote for Obama, then this must surely be because they are living in an atmosphere wherein even the act of not voting for a black man is indicative of 'racism'. In other words, they are living in an atmosphere that is both intimidating and anti-white - not anti-black. Finally, let us remember that most of the people on this planet are not 'white'. And so when the BBC and their left-wing cronies in government seek to profit themselves by persistently suggesting to the world that whites are inherently racist - which they are not - what they are doing is actually stirring up hatred towards their very own people throughout most of the world. And you cannot sink much lower than that! Youngsters Are Getting Dumber Bright
teenagers are a disappearing breed, an alarming new study has revealed. Yes indeed. Our youngsters are not as bright as they once were - despite all the lies from the teaching profession over the years claiming that their standards have risen. And the good professor who did the research seems to blame TV, video games and the standard testing procedures that were introduced some time ago. Hocus Pocus! There are two main reasons why our brightest children are getting dumber. 1. The standard of teaching in our schools has deteriorated quite significantly over the years; part of this is to do with the fact that the teachers (and parents) are having to deal with more difficult pupils and they are less able to keep them in line, and part of this is due to the fact that the teachers continue to use decidedly inferior teaching methods; e.g. see my piece Well Done the Girls? 2. Many boys have actually given up when it comes to education; so boring, so feminised, so wish-washy, so politically-corrected and so uninteresting has much of education now become for them. And my guess is that most of this drop in the intellectual ability of our brightest children is to be found in the boys, rather than in the girls - though both will have dropped. And the main reason for this is because our feminist-dominated schools and colleges have continued to do just about everything that can be done in order to advantage the girls over the boys - even though it has been very clear that both sexes have been disadvantaged by what they have been doing - something that they have persistently tried to cover up for decades. In other words, provided that the girls were gaining relative to the boys, it did not matter to those in the higher echelons of education that both the girls and the boys would be disadvantaged by their various anti-male tamperings with the system. The primary aim was to advantage the girls, not to elevate the standards of education. And the fact that the abilities of our brightest children have fallen, coupled with the fact that the girls are doing far better than the boys, demonstrates, firstly, that the feminists have succeeded in their aim of advantaging the girls and, secondly, that the horrendous cost to all our children and, hence, to our country, has been immeasurable. Furthermore, our schools are far better resourced now than they have ever been throughout the whole of history; not only in terms of money and staff, but also in terms of the amazing computer technologies that can now help children to learn. And so the falling standards really do attest not only to the most appalling levels of incompetence of the teaching profession as a whole, but also to the lack of concern for our children. And my advice to our teachers - particularly to our male teachers - would be this. Get fighting! Stand up to the politically-corrected educational codswallop that disadvantages and dumbs down all our children. Stand up for the boys. And refuse to put up with bad behaviour in your classroom. And, of course, stop undermining our boys by persistently telling our children that our women have been the victims of male oppression for thousands of years; because this is just not true. Our women have had it very easy indeed in comparison to what our men have had to endure. (video 2 mins) Yo! (LOL!)
The Bully Boys and Girls of Hackney I have pinched the following piece from the Times in order to give you an example of just how arrogant, self-serving, draconian and tyrannical have left-wing government workers now become. ...
Thought crime isn’t a confirmed sport for the 2012 Olympics, but Hackney
council would be gold-medal favourites if it ever were. ... (Ian Sinclair's new book has got nothing to do with the Olympics. It is just a novel about various fictional people who lived in his area over the years.) Basically, what these self-aggrandised nazis working at the council offices have said to Ian Sinclair is this. "You cannot use our library because you once wrote a piece criticising government policy." Tell me. How long do you think that your liberty and that of your loved ones is going to last unless you stand up and fight against these governmental thugs? What next, eh? "You cannot get your welfare cheque because you once criticised the prime minister." "You cannot use this governmental facility because you once criticised one of our policies." "The fire department will not come to your aid because your husband once wrote a piece of which we disapproved." Libraries are a major public resource in the UK. In the case of Hackney, the library is controlled by the local left-wing government. It is outrageous for a member of the public to be denied the full use of this resource simply because he has voiced disapproval of a particular government policy. How long will it be before those who do not support 'the Labour party' are treated like dirt by government workers? - and worse. We have seen this sort of thing happen before - quite recently, in fact - China, Russia, N Korea etc etc - and mostly, under left-wing, socialist/communist type governments; such as the one controlling the borough of Hackney. "You have failed your exams because it appears that your views might not be entirely politically correct." This is already happening! People do fail their exams on such grounds. Please wake up. Left-wing governments and many of their workers are basically saying this. "Either you support policies that support those of us who work for government, or you will be seriously disadvantaged by us in some way." Secrecy In Family Courts Not Good Ministers promised yesterday to reduce the secrecy of family courts, which can make decisions about parents' access to children. + There is a powerful lobby against openness, made up of those with a vested interest in avoiding scrutiny. Camilla Cavendish (Also see AH's Family Court Secrecy.) Single Mothers Not Good Children from broken homes are almost FIVE TIMES more likely to develop emotional problems than those living with both parents.
Ethnic Minority Women Suffering From Tokenism New research published by the Fawcett Society and the Government Equalities Office reveals that ethnic minority women leaders need to overcome significant institutional obstacles to achieve success. Organisations are placing ethnic minority women in senior roles to improve their organisations' equality credentials. As a result, senior ethnic minority women are facing widespread assumptions that they are not in their roles because of their own merit or abilities. Well, this is hardly surprising, is it? Ethnic minority women are being streamed into equality and diversity roles even where their training and professional skills lie elsewhere. The cost to millions of ordinary people of putting into jobs those who are less qualified to do those jobs is not only staggering, but also unfair on them. For example, how many thousands of children in our schools are being let down educationally - something that can blight their entire lives - just so that a few people from privileged 'minority' groups can get to do jobs for which they are not the best candidates? (Also see Is the Training of Women Doctors A Waste of Money?) And how many billions of dollars must it cost us every year to pay for the endless rules, regulations, discussions, meetings, arguments, lawsuits and staff that are involved in ensuring that so-called 'diversity' and 'equality' dictates what has to be done and not to be done. It is such a waste of our time, our energy, our money and our resources. My own view is that all this diversity and equality baloney has got to stop. Apart from the enormous costs to us all, I just do not believe that many people are that prejudiced any more. Indeed, I suspect that prejudice is going to increase if all this nonsense does not stop. Even ultra-leftie, ex Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone was on the TV the other day saying that many of the recent high-profile allegations of racism by black police officers in the Metropolitan Police were a load of hooey. But, of course, government workers whose sole raison-d'etre is to find prejudice in order to justify their existence will never stop creating a hoohah about it. Organisms! They have to find food to eat! - even if they have to create it out of nothing. (END NOTE: I would feel just as aggrieved if people were being given preferential treatment for being white.)
Nationalisation Rumours Shock Markets Shares in Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) collapsed yesterday, dropping 39 per cent amid fears that shareholders’ investments would be wiped out in a part-nationalisation of the UK banking sector. For those who think that nationalisation of the banks is a good idea, bear in mind that the more that the government influences loan decisions by banks, the more will men lose out - because decisions based on political correctness rather than on financial considerations will start to prevail. For example, those in the usual privileged 'minority' groups will likely receive far more favourable deals - e.g. pay less interest - than will white heterosexual males. Milking The Taxpayer A mother of seven is being paid £170,000 a year in benefits so she can live in a £1.2 million mansion. Amongst other benefits, single mothers with one child living in London can receive up to £1500 per month just to cover the cost of their rent for private accommodation. This is more than the average man earns after tax. The idea, as ever, is to make men worth less when it comes to women and children. Indeed, it will take the entire income tax of almost three average men to pay for such a woman's benefits - or, more accurately, the entire income tax of almost three average working people - men and women - to do so. And it will take the entire income tax of about 25 average working people to pay for the benefits of the above woman living in her 'mansion'. Another Attempt To Ban Smacking Labour MPs will launch a fresh attempt to ban parents from smacking their children. Left-wing politicians know that the more that they can disempower the parents when it comes to their own children, the more can they empower themselves at the expense of the people. Senior Officer Close To Tears The senior police officer in charge of the operation that led to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes came close to tears as she described the "horrible" and "terrible" tragedy of killing an innocent man. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick told an inquest that she thinks "every day" about whether police could have done anything differently. I wonder if Harriet Harman thinks daily about the tens of thousands of completely innocent people whom she was responsible for killing and maiming in Iraq. Nah. (Also see my piece, Harriet Harman - Getting Away With Murder.) And, talking of police officers, I see that London's black police officers are continuing with their campaign to undermine the police force by claiming that they do not get the promotion that they deserve when compared to white officers ... ... but one of the reasons for this apparent 'hostility' from white officers might be because they are reacting angrily to what they see as bogus claims of 'racism'. Indeed, one of my spies in the force tells me that for many years the standards for prospective police recruits from ethnic minorities was lowered (in comparison to whites) in order to get the minority numbers up. The upshot, of course, was that the minority candidates who were accepted into the force were not of the same calibre as the white candidates who were accepted. And as the minority officers move up the career ladder, their shortcomings will become more and more apparent when measured against the white officers. But this is what happens when you bend the rules in favour of 'minorities' at the beginning levels. You have to keep up the levels of discrimination against the whites right throughout their career paths. And, needless to say, if you do not keep discriminating against the whites, then the black officers cry 'racism'. It's the same game with the feminists. You have to keep discriminating against the men in order to ensure that the less able women climb as high as them. And the women are 'less able' partly because they were initially chosen more on the basis of their gender than on their capabilities.
On how western governments encourage women immigrants to make false allegations of domestic violence.
Do you know what is really winding me up about all this talk about bailing out the bankers by taking more from us in taxes? - despite the fact that I really do believe that we must bail them out to save our own necks. Well, I'll tell you. It is the fact that there seems to be precious little discussion about the enormous amount of taxes that we already all have to pay these days to fund millions of government workers whom I do not believe we need to have. Indeed, over the past ten years there has been a positive explosion in the use of the new communication technologies by government departments both big and small. Huge benefits have accrued to them as a result of the arrival of a decent internet, mobile phones and much more powerful computers. And these things have made western governments hugely more powerful and more efficient than they were before. But instead of giving back to the people the enormous savings that governments have been able to make as a result of these technologies, they have used them to further empower themselves - and to take much more away from the people; not only in terms of money, but also in terms of their freedoms. Furthermore, take note that while the current economic crisis has slashed horrendously the pensions of most of the people - i.e. those who work for private enterprises - the pensions of those who work for governments (at least here in most of Europe) have not been touched at all! - because these pensions are guaranteed by government; i.e. guaranteed with the money forcibly taken from those who work outside of government. And now, these very same people - who work outside of government - are expected to foot the bills for the current fiasco! - and, of course, to maintain the luxury pensions of those who work for the government while their own pensions have tumbled and tumbled. This is slavery! People who work outside of government are expected to take all the knocks, and then they are also forced to continue paying - through their taxes - to maintain the advantageous positions of those who work within the government. "We must maintain our government services despite the financial crisis," we are continually being told here in the UK - by both the left and the right. But this is just a deceptive way of saying, "We who work for government must not be allowed to be negatively affected by the economic downturn." What a nerve, eh? In my view, if those who work outside of government are going to lose their jobs and the values of their pensions etc etc then the same should apply for those who work inside government. In other words, the burdens arising from the current crisis should be shared. Instead, however, we even have this sort of thing ... Furthermore, of course, one of the reasons for the current debacle is because people were borrowing too much money - with millions living off debt. But, of course, if the tax rates were not so darn high, then these people would not have had to borrow so much money in the first place! Finally, those in the higher echelons of government are very much the bedfellows of those who work in the higher echelons of finance (e.g. witness Tony Blair's current 'jobs') and so the proposed bailout of the banks by the humble taxpayer at the exhortation of lofty politicians has a somewhat tainted smell to it.
AH's pontifications ... War on Drugs - The Evils of Cannabis - Scum Of The Earth
Why we need a men's movement ... *** Indoctrinate U - YouTube video in 10 short parts *** Documentary filmmaker Evan Coyne Maloney investigates political censorship at colleges and universities in the United States. Watch how "free speech" Liberals censor speech at US Colleges.
But never kid yourself that the mainstream leftwing media are any better than Fox News when it comes to honest reporting. On the contrary, the politically-corrected leftwing media such as the BBC in the UK and the New York Times in America are little more than propaganda organs for the left - the main aims of the left being to forever expand governmental powers, to increase the tax rates, to take away people's liberties, to undermine their own countries and cultures and, of course, to stir up hatred towards men - from all of which they profit. I do actually admire Rupert Murdoch (owner of Fox News) for what he has achieved in his life, but I believe that he has become - and has been - a serious threat to democracy the world over, and that, as such, his huge media empire needs to be cut down quite dramatically in size. Barman Freed After Raping 12 Year Old Girl Graham admitted four counts of rape of a girl under 13 and was given a 12 month conditional discharge. Notice how the word 'rape' is purposely used by the media and the law in order to bamboozle the mostly unthinking public into thinking that this girl was forced into having sex; the idea, as ever, being to demonise as much as possible those men who have behaved inappropriately. Open Season On Men Is it open season on men this election year? I have noticed an upswing in the amount of blatant male bashing going on in the media and blogs as of late. Let me give you a few examples. Dr Helen Race War At Scotland Yard Scotland Yard is embroiled in a damaging race war which has left its leadership in meltdown. Yasmin Rehman, who has been off work with stress for the last 12 months, claims she has been subjected to racist bullying and victimisation during her time working at the Yard. The cost of highly-paid government employees taking so much paid leave for alleged sickness has reached ridiculous levels; with the country - even the poorest - having to foot the bills for these people. In my view, the discrimination laws in the UK are mostly buttressing and encouraging pernicious scams whereby those in privileged groups continually get away with conjuring up phony discrimination claims and so feathering their nests in some way. And, of course, it is mostly white men who have to bear the cost of all this; not only the financial cost, but the cost of having forever to deal with bogus accusations of one sort or another - bogus accusations that the Labour government and the feminists are forever encouraging. These people positively hate white men. Her action is the fifth to be launched against the Met, Britain's biggest force, by ethnic-minority officers or staff, and campaigners claim more are lining up to follow suit. ... the Daily Mail can reveal that the flamboyant lawyer at the centre of the campaign which is tearing Scotland Yard apart is a convicted conman with suspect legal qualifications. Guilty All adults who work or volunteer with children must have abuse allegations made against them investigated by council officers and kept on file until they retire, even if they are totally groundless. - i.e. the lefty-wing/feminist aim to break apart all relationships between men and children continues. The next step will be to keep on file all groundless allegations made by women over issues such as domestic violence, sex-assault etc etc Sarah Palin's Career Ends in Tragedy When a decent person accepts a job such as vice president, our first instinct is to celebrate that good people are in a position of power and influence. This is what the McCain campaign is counting on. But this is an illusion. The influence runs completely the other way. Good people become part of the party machine and surrender all their principles in order to survive. Lew Rockwell
BBC Discriminates Against Men White middle-class men face discrimination at women-dominated BBC, says Jeremy Paxman
(Jeremy Paxman is an extremely well-known presenter for the BBC's flagship Newsnight programme. And he also happens to be one of AH's favourite TV personalities of all times.) Of course, some of the BBC wimmin have been moaning about his comments, saying that, for example, there are many men at the top of the BBC tree, but what Jeremy Paxman really meant was that you have to work your butt off and be top-notch to get anywhere in the BBC if you are a man, but, if you are a woman, then mediocre will do! And as for the wimmin's complaints about the very popular comedy programme called "Have I Got News For You" being largely panelled by men, what can I say, eh? - except that good women comedians are few and far between, and, further, when it comes to politics - which is what this programme is mostly about - women are not as interested as men. Anyway. Jeremy Paxman is being very brave - so please send him an email and say, Well Done! On Gary Glitter If Gary Glitter is a criminal, and not mentally ill, then he has paid the price and we should not punish him again. Carole Sarler On Gary Glitter The British government is exploiting the odious Gary Glitter to smash freedom of movement and hector governments in the Third World. Tim Black Did either of the above two authors mention that the hysteria over Gary Glitter (being purposely fomented by various self-serving groups) demonises men most horribly? Not that I recall! HarrietHarmanSucks.Com People often ask why Harriet Harman - the current UK minister for Constitutional Affairs and previous Solicitor General - is so often the target of men's groups such as Fathers For Justice. Do Not Respect Them How long are you prepared to be portrayed as worthless and to be treated as such? - not only by the law, but even by ’scientists’ - AH - 8 min
Beware Of Obama Might not a junior senator with less than four years' experience on Capitol Hill be advised to show just a smidgen of humility? Melanie Phillips Eastenders Actors Upset By Murder Stars of EastEnders from past and present joined the brother of one of their own as they joined the friends of Ben Kinsella at his funeral. You reap what you sow, eh? One day, these professional hate-stirrers might wake up to how they, themselves, will lose out as a result of the hatred that they have spread over the years. Wrongful Murder Suspect Compensated Robert Murat, a formal suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, will be given more than half a million pounds in libel damages by British media outlets, according to reports today. He deserves hell of a lot more than that! The way in which the tabloids portrayed this man was absolutely outrageous. In one case, he was actually described as behaving like the convicted child-murderer, Ian Huntley, in order to demonise him as much as possible, and it was also suggested that he had been caught with child pornography. A completely innocent man! - portrayed by the tabloids as a paedophile and a child murderer. The tabloids will have made many millions out of the numerous lurid stories and lies that they told about this man throughout their hysterical and hateful media campaign concerning the child's disappearance. They should, therefore, have to pay out considerably more than half a million. Still. Thank goodness for the laws of libel, eh? Dig - dig - to all those men who think that freedom of speech should be 'absolute' and never curtailed in any way. Men, more than any other group these days, need the protection of the libel laws. Knife Crime In the wake of recent knife murders across the country, ministers unveiled a hastily-assembled package of measures intended to tackle the problem, which some police chiefs now see as a greater challenge than stopping terrorist attacks. - probably only of interest to Brits. On and on and on they go. Week after week after week. "We must do something about the appalling levels of stabbings and knife murders that keep taking place in this country," the police and the politicians say. And what do they do? They do absolutely NOTHING! - except p#ss about seeing if they can grab themselves a bit more power on the basis of this appalling level of violence. For example, ... Increase surveillance. Increase detection. Increase punishment. But what they won't do, of course, is to implement policies that will promote families and their cohesion. Nor will they implement policies that empower parents, teachers and police officers to deal with our wayward youth more effectively. The Labour government has no real genuine concern about crime or violence - except, of course, the fear that it might bring about bad publicity. This, they do worry about. And, of course, the politicians won't do anything about the disgusting knife block. Remember: Promoting or selling this knife block would be illegal in the UK if it depicted any group other than 'men'. Maybe Fathers4Justice can do something about it. Maybe if Fathers4Justice pulled a stunt to point the finger at the scumbags who keep selling this knife block then it would embarrass the police and the politicians - because it would demonstrate to the public just how worthless and bigoted they are. It would show the public that while the police and the politicians are well aware that this knife block promotes violence - as is evidenced by the fact that it would be illegal if it depicted any group other than 'men' - when it comes to men being stabbed, these officials are completely unconcerned and, indeed, are quite happy to see such stabbings actually promoted. In other words, all their public wailing and whining about the high levels of knife crime is nothing but the usual empty charade that we get from government officials - because, quite clearly, they have no genuine desire to discourage knife crime against men. Now, before you all start yawning - that's what I would do; if I was not such a coward. I would sit on roofs. But, of course, I would be more devious - because that's the kind of guy I am. I would firstly email various politicians and senior police officers in advance. And I would tell them that I and my activists were going to highlight to the public just how duplicitous and insincere they are when it comes to all their empty promises about dealing with knife crime. And then it would be their choice, wouldn't it? Either they do something about this knife block, or they face the humiliation of being shown up in the media for the lying worthless scumbags that they are. Now, for my less able readers - of which there are many! - the point about this knife block being sold in the UK is not only to do with the levels of violence (particularly stabbings) that it might inspire, it is to do with the fact that it would be illegal if it depicted any group other than 'men' - and it would be illegal precisely because the politicians and the police really do believe that this knife block does incite violence. Well, if they believe this, then why don't they do something about it? D'ya see? You've got them by the short and curlies. And they would surely hate for this to be witnessed by millions of people - particularly millions of men. Hmm. I think I'll have to start my own roof-topping activist group. What shall I call it, eh? Hmm. Men4Justice? Nah. Too obvious. Men4Equality? Nah. Too naff. Ah yes, I know! AngryHarry4President! That's the one! LOL! And now I must get back to writing my future award-winning piece about Harriet Harman. Half Of All British Servicemen Say They Want To Quit Britain’s ability to sustain campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan was called into question last night as it emerged that almost half of all military personnel are ready to quit. Yes indeed. Our men in the military are beginning to wake up to the fact that they are being treated like dirt on so many fronts that they are ready to throw in the towel when it comes to fighting for this country. Ah yes, the Inevitable Downfall of the More Powerful continues apace. The government is losing its hold over its men. And I can tell you quite categorically that this state of affairs is being generated with some significant contribution from the MM. Whether it be Fathers4Justice sitting on top of roofs or our world of internet activism wherein we push into the minds of mainstream pundits our most fabulous point of view - the message is getting through to more and more men. There is a mutiny on the horizon! Message to government ... You will never win this one. And, interestingly, I was watching an interview with Tony Benn last night (a very left-wing politician who sat in the UK Parliament as an MP for 51 long years) and he said virtually nothing that would not have been totally consistent with what is customarily said on this website. According to Tony Benn; politicians are, nowadays, liars, corrupt and self-serving. And Gordon Brown, in principle, really is not that much different from Stalin! Tony Benn! A truly left-wing politician! He also wanted to see Tony Blair indicted for war crimes. Me too. But I want to see Harriet Harman indicted as well. Esther Rantzen Has Serious Regrets "I had no idea the result [of setting up Child Line] would be senseless over-protection [of chidren] which pretends to see danger where there is none." (Esther Rantzen was a pioneer in setting up systems to protect children from abuse. She is a feminist - and, probably, was one of the best-known media personalities in the UK throughout the 70s, 80s and 90s. The irony is that, to an extent, I blame myself for this rubbish. By revealing the extent of child abuse in the BBC TV programme Childwatch in the Eighties, I was part of the revolution in child protection which created these insidious jobsworths. ... What a tragedy if, even from the best of motives, we deprive ourselves and our children of the affection and fun that make childhood so precious. The above piece by Esther Rantzen is of major significance when it comes to the campaign against all the child abuse propaganda that persistently poisons all our relationships - especially those of men - and which is largely promulgated by people in various groups - including the government - whose main aim is to serve themselves in some way. And, while on this subject, regular readers will know that there is a mountain of evidence all over this website supporting the contention that there are many groups colluding with each other in order to profit from the stirring up of relationship breakdown - with governments and organisations like the NSPCC profiting to the tune of tens of billions of dollars every year by stirring up abuse hysteria. Well, here is a piece by European Member of Parliament, Danial Hannan, pointing out to us something that, I think, most of us did not know. Well, I certainly didn't! ... In 2007, ActionAid, the NSPCC, One World Action and Oxfam received, among them, €43,051,542.95 ... from the European Commission. Notice that the NSPCC is being given large sums of money out of the European coffers. In other words, our European governmental bureaucrats are piling millions of pounds into an organisation - the NSPCC - which thrives only by stirring up abuse hysteria. In essence, via the NSPCC, these governmental officials are fuelling a huge mountain of hatred, relationship breakdown and societal disharmony. And, if you read the article, you will also discover that the NSPCC is active in supporting the increase in growth and power of the European government! What a surprise, eh? This is not democracy at work. We are all being cheated. The European government is handing over millions of dollars of our money to groups that will actively promote it. And it is also handing over our money to groups that will stir up societal disharmony, from which, of course, it stands to profit even more hugely. Organisms!
Living Alone Increases Carbon Emissions Efforts to cut emissions and turn Britain green are being undermined by the growing number of people living alone.
Well, you never know, he might have done! "Without being in any way over-dramatic or alarmist, my prediction would be that the effects of family breakdown on the life of the nation, and ordinary people, in this country will, within the next 20 years, be as marked and as destructive as the effects of global warming. Judges are witnessing a "never-ending carnival" of human misery, and almost all of society's social ills can be traced back to the collapse in family stability, he says. Yo! Unfortunately, however, the judge then goes on to say that ... the family justice system - comprising social workers, local authorities, mental health specialists and legal experts - is all that stands between the present dire situation and "social anarchy". He also wants the Government to invest millions in properly researched projects which boost family stability. And the problem with all this, as we know, is that the 'family experts' and the government 'researchers' are themselves the major problem. And so we will not find the solutions with these people at the helm. It would be like putting the fox in charge of protecting the chickens. Feminists Destroy The Planet Our children and our planet can go to Hell. AH Too Many Women Doctors Too many women doctors working fewer hours than men will ultimately result in a major shortage of GPs, a leading specialist warns today. (Also see AH's old piece entitled Is the Training of Women Doctors A Waste of Money? - to which the answer is a big, resounding, Yes.) Indeed, it is a huge waste of money, and it also deprives the most vulnerable people in our society - the sick, the poor, the old and the weak - of services which they need. Furthermore, every single one of us will need to use the health services throughout our lives, and so every one us will have to suffer a significantly impoverished service as a result of the policies promoted by political correctness and feminists. But nothing must stand in the way of a few thousand women doing what they want to do, eh? Teachers Finally Speak Up About Family Breakdown The decline of marriage is leading to widespread underachievement and indiscipline in schools, teachers warned yesterday. Growing numbers are being brought up in splintered families by mothers with children by different fathers, leading to behaviour and mental health problems including eating disorders and suicidal thoughts, a teachers' conference heard. Members of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers demanded a proper recognition of the impact of family breakdown on education and called on ministers to do more to promote marriage. At last! But Brits should note that the National Union of Teachers - another union - which, if I recall correctly, is actually the biggest official association of teachers in the country - still remains dominated by political correctness and feminism, and, for example, still remains determined to support policies that undermine the education of boys. In my view, male teachers reading this who belong to the NUT should think about joining another union and, hence, stop supporting an organisation that expends so much of its energy undermining you! Purposely Damaging Families They [the left-wing 'liberal' elite] have deliberately and wickedly created over the years a legal and welfare engine of mass fatherlessness and child abandonment, resulting in a degraded and dependent underclass and a lengthening toll of human wreckage. Melanie Phillips ... ... but my underlining - for added effect!
Two Parents Best For Educational Attainment Children who live with both parents are improving their GCSE performance almost twice as fast as classmates living with just their mothers, it was revealed. Yes indeed. I might also add that the children of single mothers are also often very disruptive of the education of those children who do have two parents - something that will tend to lead to an underestimation of the true educational benefits of having two parents. Perhaps of mild interest to my regular readers is the fact that it was the ugly furore - generated somewhere in the late 80s by the feminist-dominated media - over a headteacher's statement that children were educationally better off if they had two parents that first really alerted me to the fact that the welfare of children was of no significance at all to feminists. It was absolutely obvious to almost everyone that the children of single parents were at a significant educational disadvantage - and, in many other ways too - so much so that teachers would often take special care to help such children - but it soon became clear that people were no longer able to talk openly about this without being accused of denigrating single mothers. The negative effects on children were to be ignored - and denied. The feminists' determination to break up families and encourage single motherhood trumped everything. Calls for this headteacher to be sacked for daring to tell the truth really shocked me at the time. And it woke me up to the nasty world in which we were now living - a world controlled by liars and bullies who were pursuing their own selfish aims regardless of the enormous costs to others - even to the children; which is one of the reasons that the oft-used politically correct mantra 'in the best interests of the child' used to sicken me so often. Nearly every time (and I am not exaggerating) that this mantra was quoted it was used as nothing more than a smokescreen to stifle debate and to hide the real motives of those who employed it. The further implication of the view that a single mother was good enough was the notion that, as far as the children were concerned, fathers were, quite simply, pointless. Needless to say, it was quite acceptable to promote this point of view. Indeed, this message has been permeating the ether in one way or another for some three decades now - accompanied, of course, with the added view that men, themselves, are pointless. 'Parasites', in fact. Well, the good news is that feminism and those disgusting people who promote it are now most definitely under increasing attack - though political progress still remains painfully slow - and I hope that it will not be too long now before they finally get what they deserve. (Also see my piece Steve Jones - A Parasite?) Father Learns The Hard Way | |
California
Recognises Male Victims Of Domestic Violence 
